Friday, October 12, 2012

Food and Sustainability issues of the Appalachians


The Appalachian region faces a unique situation with food acquisition common to less hospitable terrain. Due to the rocky hills and dense forests, the region is not ideal for crop or livestock farming. Food must be shipped in on semi-trucks from farms and distribution centers in the foothills. The routes into the mountains are often treacherous two lane roads laden with switchbacks and cliffs, making progress slow and pushing brakes and transmissions to the edge. This difficult venture causes prices for goods to skyrocket and encourages actions such as hunting, trapping and fishing for nutrition, which cuts down on local wildlife populations.
Sustainability issues of the area relate back to the problem of food and also for shelter and expansion.  Again, the necessity of locals to hunt wildlife for food causes a decreased population and can lead to species extinction. In addition, an ever-growing demand for timber for housing and amenities results in acres of forest land being wiped out by the thousands. The loss of forested land results in habitat loss for both tree dwelling creatures like birds and squirrels and ground dwelling animals, which rely on the cover of the trees to survive. Expansion of housing developments and tree farms also result in cleared forests. Very few trees are saved for housing developments and the trees in tree farms are small and unsuitable for habitats. 

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Environmental Ethics Artifact


I chose this picture as my artifact of environmental ethics because of the different interpretations I saw when I looked at it. The picture is supposed to represent man's eternal struggle with nature. However, I believe it almost looks as if the man, while toppling the tree, is actually embracing it, as if for a hug. I saw two separate relations for this. The first relation is the two main attitudes of man towards nature currently. Many people continue to believe in destroying the nature and harvesting the woods to spread civilization, which the man toppling the tree represents. However, many others believe in preserving nature and keeping it from falling, which the man embracing the tree represents. Another outlook on the scene is what most people believe today versus what they need to think. Again, the man toppling the tree represents the majority that believe nature must be beaten, while the man embracing the tree represents what we should be thinking, that nature must be preserved, in order to protect the environment and the world for future generations.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Synthesis - Fracking Fury

The writer of this article offers a neutral opinion to the idea of hydraulic fracking, listing both facts and concerns about the process. He begins by explaining the process of hydraulic fracturing and the content of the hydraulic fluid used in the process. The pros of the fracking are given, a short list which mainly details the advantages of natural gas over coal or oil. This explanation does little to actually support the process, rather the result. The author then lists the cons, which must be divided between several categories, including the effects on water, human health, animal health, earthquakes and pollution. This expansive section of concerns, while presented with a neutral tone, show both the authors and the peoples concerns with the process. The writer also reference the EPA findings in Pavillion, Wyoming referenced in the Lustgarten article. Loopholes in environmental regulations explain how natural gas companies get away with groundwater contamination but a mention of pending legislation to close those loopholes suggest the writer supports the regulation of hydraulic fracturing. The writer concludes again in a neutral tone by stating that current EPA tests will determine the fate of the hydraulic fracturing process.

Palliser, Janna. "Fracking Fury." Science Scope n.d. 20-24. EBSCO Host. Web. 30 Sept. 2012.